The Formula Applies To Everyone.
And It Is Totalitarian.
(It is not successful until no one can escape, i.e., everyone must participate.)
(Personal note.)
by
Dean Gotcher
"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15
"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9
The formula is not academics or an ideology (as is commonly portrayed). It is spiritual. It is Genesis 3:1-6 being applied in everyone's life in order (as in "new" world" order) to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, in order to negate Romans 7:14-25.
"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') In other words, for Karl Marx et al. "Lust reconciles you to the world," 'justifying' the negation (killing) of anyone who gets in the way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous. The road to "Utopia" is paved with the bodies of those who got in the way.
The formula is being applied in all walks of life, in education, in the workplace, in the media, in entertainment, in government, in the home, and even in the "church." Kurt Lewin summed it up best, i.e., how to negate Romans 7:14-25, i.e., the guilty conscience ("the negative valence") for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. Negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority that engenders the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating and the person can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, i.e., without having any sense of guilt for his carnal thoughts and carnal actions. In Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process he found the solution, i.e., the formula. There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process, there is only the "self interests," i.e., the "lusts" of those participating, 'justifying' their "self," i.e., their "lusts" before one another, negating the father's/Father's authority, and the guilty conscience it engenders in the process—with everyone becoming god, i.e., "good" (since only God is good) in their eyes, deciding right and wrong from their nature, following the facilitator of 'change' who "saved" them, i.e., who 'liberated' ('redeemed') them from the father's/Father's authority so they could be "of and for self" only ('reconciling' their "self" to the world that stimulates pleasure in them), "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience. The savior either (sent by the Father) pays the price for your sins, 'redeeming' you from judgment and damnation for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, with the Father 'reconciling' you to himself in the resurrection of his Son from the grave (with you inheriting eternal life by having faith in him, doing the Father's will) or he (as a facilitator of 'change') 'liberates' you from the Father's authority (by 'creating' a "safe zone," "Ye shalt not surely die") so you can be your "self," "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, 'reconciling' you to the world that stimulates pleasure in you, with you following, serving, protecting, praising, and worshiping him (dying in your sins, spending eternity with him in the lake of fire that is never quenched).
"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality) By simply telling everyone in the room to be "positive," i.e., tolerating of deviant behavior and not "negative," i.e., judging or condemning anyone for their opinion, those holding to the father's/Father's authority, i.e., those attempting to preach, teach, and discuss established commands, rules, facts, and truth, holding others accountable to them become the enemy, resulting in "the group" attacking (silencing, censoring, removing) them, without having a guilty conscience.
"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves:" (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History) It is the "conscience," i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., the father's/Father's authority in us that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks 'change,' i.e., "deviant behavior."
"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" [Communism] in Community Policing)
"The community of interest generated by crime, disorder, and fear of crime [the citizens coming together, looking for answers to stopping crime in their community] becomes the goal to allow community policing officer [trained as facilitators of 'change'] an entree into the geographic community [infiltration, usurping, and negating local control, making local control now subject to regional control/international control via the consensus process]." "... once you can identify a community [where the parent's are willing to 'compromise' the standards they keep their family to, in order to initiate and sustain relationship with those outside of the immediate family], you have discovered the primary unity of society above the individual and the family that can be mobilized ... to bring about positive social change." (Trojanowicz) If you want anarchy and revolution, i.e., 'change' you must negate the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the "middle-class" which engenders the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. By using crime (instead of stopping it, any "crisis" will do) to bring "the people" together to dialogue their opinions to a consensus on how to solve the "crisis," the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the "middle-class," i.e., the greatest barrier to socialism/globalism is negated.
"It is usually easier to change individuals formed into a group than to change any one of them separately." (Kurt Lewin in Kenneth Bennie, Human Relations in Curriculum Change) The dynamics of "the group" ("group dynamics"), i.e., the persons desire for "the groups" approval (affirming his carnal desires) has a direct effect upon his thinking and acting.
"The individual accepts the new system of values and beliefs by accepting belongingness to the group." (ibid.) The individual, 'loyal' to the father's/Father's authority, while being in "the group," can stand alone against "the group," while the individual 'loyal' to "the group" must negate the father's/Father's authority that gets in the way of "the group."
"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory) It is in dialogue we discover our commonality with one another, i.e., our common "self interests" in each other, 'justifying' our "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., what which we have in common, i.e., that which is "of the world" only before one another. It is here that we perceive our "self" as being the personification of "the people," i.e., how we "feel" is how "the people" "feel." When we "feel" "repressed" and/or "alienated," "the people" are being "repressed" and/or "alienated"—'justifying' our making laws, i.e., right and wrong subject to our "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., subject to 'change,' i.e., subject to "rapid 'change.'"
"In an ordinary discussion people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) In order to have a discussion you must suspend, as upon a cross your "self," i.e., your "self interest," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating in order (as in "old" world order) to hear and receive the truth, i.e., you must humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, which engenders a guilty conscience in you when you do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., when you "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. In discussion you fellowshipping with others based upon established commands, rules, facts, and truth, inhibiting or blocking 'change.'
"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity) In order to dialogue you must suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that inhibits or blocks dialogue, i.e., that prevents you and the other person's from sharing your and their "self interests," i.e., your and their "lusts" of the 'moment that the world, i.e., that the current situation and/or people are stimulating. In dialogue you "build relationship" with others based upon "self interest," i.e., "lust," initiating and sustaining 'change.'
When we talk to our "self" we "juxtaposition" between dialogue, i.e., what we "want" and discussion, i.e., what is right and what is wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth we have been taught, finding "homeostasis," i.e., a balance somewhere between the two (as long as we continue to dialogue with our "self," 'justifying' our "lusts"). By the one in authority loading the environment up with commands, rules, facts, and truth without any opportunity for discussion, dialogue , i.e., "self" 'justification can increase to a breaking point, i.e., call "critical thinking" or "critical theory" ("Critical Criticism," Karl Marx) where hate turns into action (praxis), i.e., violence erupts. By the "educator," i.e., the facilitator of 'change' loading the environment up with dialogue, 'justifying' "want" over and therefore against discussion, i.e., 'justifying' the child's carnal desires over and therefore against doing the father's/Father' will, "violence" becomes anyone who prevents the child from having what he "wants," 'justifying' violence against them in order to get what he "wants," negating not only the father's/Father's authority, but also the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating in the child's thoughts and action. By placing a child (or you) in an environment of dialogue ("feelings"), where right and wrong behavior is at issue, the discussion (commands, rules, facts, and truth) based child goes into a state or condition called "cognitive dissonance" where he is caught between what he wants and doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, having to choose between the two—with choosing discussion (which includes preaching and teaching commands, rules, facts, and truth) placing him at odds with "the group" or choosing "the group" ("relationship") placing him a odds with his parent's (the father's/Father's) authority, i.e., established commands, rules, facts, and truth. In an environment of discussion his "private conviction," i.e., his guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., his parent's (the father's/Father's) authority remains in tact.
"Change in methods of leadership is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture [paradigm] of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." (Barker, Dembo, & Lewin, "frustration and regression: an experiment with young children" in Child Behavior and Development) Replace the father's/Father's authority system ("old school"), i.e., 1) the preaching of commands and rules to be accepted as given and obeyed, the teaching of facts and truth to be accepted as is, by faith, and the discussing of any questions those under authority might have regarding the commands, rules, facts, and truth being taught (at the one in authorities discretion: providing they deem it necessary, have time, those under authority are able to understand, and are not questioning, challenging, deifying, disregarding, attacking authority), 2) rewarding those who do right and obey, 3) correcting and/or chastening those who do wrong and/or disobey, that they might learn to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, which engenders a guilty conscience in them when they do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., when they "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, 4) casting out or expelling any who question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack authority, with the child's carnal nature, i.e., dialogue, i.e., the sharing of everyone's "feelings," i.e., opinions to a consensus—when it comes to right and wrong behavior—with no fear of judgment and/or punishment for being or doing wrong and the deed (praxis), i.e., the 'liberation' of "self" from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the negation of the father's/Father's authority in the participants thoughts is done, 'liberating' them to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, with everyone's affirmation.
Almost all my issues begin with or include 1 John 2:16, Luke 16:15, and Jeremiah 17:9. They sum up the 'drive' and the 'purpose' of the formula, i.e., the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, i.e., the 'justification of "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh" and "the lust of the eyes" before others, engendering "the pride of life," i.e., that which is only "of the world," negating the father's/Father's authority, thereby negating the guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating) in everyone's thoughts and actions in order (as in "new" world order) for the facilitator of ''change' to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, with everyone's affirmation. There is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, in an opinion, or in the consensus process, there is only your (and everyone else's, including the facilitator of 'change's') "self interest," i.e., your (and their, including the facilitator of 'change's') "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating.
The formula is based upon generalization, pitting what we all have in common, i.e., our "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, which unites us against that which makes us different, i.e., our father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth that divides us from one another. A classroom of twenty students holding to their parent's standards, which differ from one another is a room full of students who are divided ("alienated") from one another. By preaching, teaching, and discussing established commands, rules, facts, and truth, parental authority and therefore division remains between the students. By "encouraging" the students to dialogue their opinions—regarding right and wrong behavior (regarding social issues)—their love of ("lust" for) pleasure and hate of restraint (that which they all have in common) becomes the outcome, resulting in their classroom experience uniting them as "one," establishing their "self," i.e., their "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating over and therefore against their parent's authority.
"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)
| The soul knows by being told. The flesh by "sense experience." |
The "educator" does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature over and therefore against their parents authority. Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parents standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other students love of pleasure and hate of restrain, doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, holding onto their parents standards, i.e., refusing to participate in the process of 'change' or fighting against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" peoples "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student's natural desire for approval and fear of rejection forces him to participate. The same outcome applies to all adults, in any profession who participate in the process.
By 'justifying' your "self" before others, i.e., in the dialoguing (sharing) of your opinion (your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interests," i.e., your "lusts") before others to a consensus (to a "feeling" of "oneness") the father's/Father's authority is negated, negating the guilty conscience in the process, so you and they, now only "of and for self," i.e., only "of and for the world" can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' with impunity, i.e., with "no fear of God" before your and their eyes, i.e., with no sense of accountability for your and their carnal thoughts and carnal actions, 'justifying the negation of anyone who gets in the way, including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous—for the "good" (pleasure, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts") of "self," others, and the world, i.e., "the people." Since "good" is no longer found in the father/Father i.e., in doing the father's/Father's will but found only in pleasure, i.e., in "the lust of the flesh" and "the lust of the eyes" which includes the pleasure which comes with the praises of men, i.e., "the pride of life," which is only "of the world," the negation of the father's/Father's authority, i.e., of having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., the questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking of the father's/Father's authority becomes "good."
Your heart's natural desire is to enjoy the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, making pleasure, i.e., "the lust of the eyes," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life" the only means by which to know "good." With pleasure being the standard for "good" then anyone who stands in the way of pleasure, i.e., "good" becomes "evil"—'justifying' their negation, making your heart not just wicked but "desperately wicked" in its effort to initiate or sustain pleasure "Now." As someone intoxicated with, addicted to, and possessed by a drug your hearts natural response to anyone attempting to take away pleasure, i.e., to take that which is "good" away, is hate. Since pleasure, i.e., "lust" stands in the way, blinding you to it, you can not see your hate as being wicked ("disparately wicked" since you are acting on it, carrying it out, i.e., putting it into praxis in the 'moment'—'justifying' your hate, i.e., your attempt to negate anyone who stands in the way of pleasure). When you 'justify' pleasure, i.e., your "self," i.e., your "lusts," i.e., your heart's desires, you automatically 'justify' your hatred toward anyone who gets in the way, perceiving it as "necessary."
"It is not about you" the facilitator of 'change' says when you question the process, i.e., question him. No. It is all about him—wanting to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning), with your affirmation. As long as the father's/Father's authority exists the facilitator of 'change' can not "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, i.e., the fear of judgment. To get rid of, i.e., negate the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating he must first get rid of, i.e., negate the father's/Father's authority. If you adhere to the father's/Father's authority he must get rid of, i.e., negate you so he can live in "peace," i.e., "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, with "the people's" approval, i.e., affirmation. In the "new" world order everyone must participate in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, i.e., the negation of the father's/Father's authority in their thoughts and actions in order for the facilitator of 'change' to rule over "the people," "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning), with their affirmation. Anyone standing in their way to "peace and affirmation," i.e., "worldly peace and socialist harmony" must be negated.
The 'moment' the facilitator of 'change' enters the room what follows is all about his or her use of and your participation in the formula, i.e., in the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus process, using Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from and thought your "feelings" of the 'moment') in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, thereby negating the need for a savior in the process, so he or she can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, i.e., fear of judgment, with "the peoples" affirmation., i.e., "the peoples" praise and worship. The 'moment' the Serpent, the master facilitator of 'change' got the woman in the garden in Eden into dialogue—regarding right and wrong behavior—he knew he "had" her. The same formula applies to (works on) you, your spouse, your children, your neighbors, your boss and fellow workers, your representatives, your leaders, your judges, your minister today. It is totalitarian. It is not successful until no one can escape, i.e., everyone must participate (or the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating remains).
"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4
"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." Genesis 6:5
"... for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth;..." Genesis 8:21
"But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be." Matthew 24:37-39
"For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh: (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ; And having in a readiness to revenge all disobedience, when your obedience is fulfilled." 2 Corinthians 10:3-6
"Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;" Ephesians 6:11-18
"And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death." Revelation 12:11
"And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it. For what is a man advantaged, if he gain the whole world, and lose himself, or be cast away? For whosoever shall be ashamed of me and of my words, of him shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he shall come in his own glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels." Luke 9:23-26
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4
Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.
"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17
Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.
"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12
© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020